November 2026

What Is the Mark of the Beast?

The mark of the beast is described in Revelation 13. It is associated with allegiance to the Antichrist and participation in his economic system. 

People speculate all the time about what it might be—microchips, barcodes, technology, and so forth. But Scripture emphasizes worship and allegiance more than technology. 

The key issue is loyalty. Those who take the mark are identifying themselves with the beast and rejecting God. 

So rather than trying to identify every new technology as the mark, we should focus on remaining faithful to Christ. 

 
Revelation 13:12–18

12 He exercises all the authority of the first beast on his behalf and compels the earth and those who live on it to worship the first beast, whose fatal wound was healed. 13 He also performs great signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to earth in front of people. 14 He deceives those who live on the earth because of the signs that he is permitted to perform on behalf of the beast, telling those who live on the earth to make an image of the beast who had the sword wound and yet lived. 15 He was permitted to give a spirit to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast could both speak and cause whoever would not worship the image of the beast to be killed. 16 And he requires everyone—small and great, rich and poor, free and slave—to be given a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17 so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark: the beast’s name or the number of his name.

18 Here is wisdom: The one who has understanding must calculate the number of the beast, because it is the number of a man. His number is 666. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
He exercises all the authority of the first beast, while in the presence of the first beast (v. 12), demonstrating his subordination to the first. This false prophet would perform many miracles by the power of Satan (2Th 2:9–11) and enforce worship of a talking idol of the first beast through universal economic leverage. Those who did not have a mark on their bodies showing such allegiance would be denied food or, in some cases, be killed (vv. 13–17). The first beast would be known by his number six hundred and sixty-six (v. 18). Some have associated this number with the base six numerical system of Babylon (implied in Dn 3:1), concluding that this individual is the perfect representation of humanism. In the ancient world, letters of an alphabet were sometimes assigned numerical coefficients so that a specific person came to be associated with a number equal to the value of his name. No conclusive identification of an individual has ever been made for the number 666, and attempts to do so based on modern alphabets are far-fetched and impossible. It may be best to accept the general sense of the number as suggested above. Believers should not fixate on minor prophetic details, but should instead concentrate on consistent faithfulness to God during perilous times. 
Why Did Jesus Ask Who People Thought the Son of Man Was?

I think Jesus’ first question in Matthew 16 is theoretical—“Who do people think the Messiah is?” Then the second question is, “Who do you think I am?” (Matt. 16:15). Peter answers that Jesus is the Messiah. I love it because Peter's great confession is a divine revelation. Jesus says, “Simon son of Jonah, you are blessed because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father in heaven” (v. 17).

I think this is amazing because after this great confession, Peter then tells the Lord that He’s not going to suffer and die. He goes right from his great confession to his great confusion. Peter, even when he’s good, ends up making a mistake. Nevertheless, that is the great confession that Jesus is the Messiah, and they understood it. They didn't understand all the ramifications of it, but they did understand that Jesus is the Messiah.

 
Matthew 16:13–17

13 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?”

14 And they said, “Some say John the Baptist; others, Elijah; still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”

15 “But you,” He asked them, “who do you say that I am?”

16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God!”

17 And Jesus responded, “Simon son of Jonah, you are blessed because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father in heaven.” (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
16:14-17. The common denominator between John the Baptist, Elijah, and Jeremiah was that they were all prophets calling the people to return to covenant faithfulness. Elijah performed miracles (1Kg 17), and there were great prophetic hopes attached to him as the forerunner of the Messiah (Mal 4:5-6; Mt 11:7-15). That Jesus’ ministry might be confused with his was understandable. Jeremiah and the prophets prophesied judgment, as did Jesus (cf. 11:20ff.; 21:33ff.). The Christ (v. 16) is a title, not a proper name, and means “one who is anointed.” In the LXX christos is used for the Hebrew masiah , “anointed,” for priests (Lv 4:5, 16; 6:22 [LXX 6:15]) and kings (e.g., 2Sm 23:1), including the future great Davidic king, the Messiah (PssSol 17:32; 18:5; 2 Bar 29:3; 30:1; 27:2; 4 Ezra 12:32). Matthew uses the word Christ elsewhere in narrative sections of his gospel (1:1, 16, 17, 18; 2:4; 11:2), but the disciples use it for the first time here. Living God is used in Jos 3:10; Jr 10:10; Dn 6:20, 26, for God’s power and uniqueness in contrast to false gods like Pan. As the Son of the living God,  Jesus can guarantee that the gates of Hades will not prevail over the Church. “Son of God” occurs in 4:3, 6, and figures prominently in 14:33 (“You are certainly God’s Son!”), where Jesus rescues Peter and the disciples from the sea, a prerogative reserved only for God in the OT (Ex 14:10–15:21; Ps 107:23-32; Jnh 1:4–2:10).  

The response of Jesus is enigmatic (v. 17). In 14:33 the disciples recognized that Jesus was God’s Son. Why did He claim divine revelation for Peter’s confession when the disciples seem to have understood this previously? Perhaps the best answer is to understand that in 14:33 the disciples ascribe divinity to Him as they witnessed His God-like power over natural forces. That episode surely led them to a budding perception of Jesus’ deity. But in 16:16, Peter connects Jesus’ divine identification with the concept of the coming Messiah, who, with a few noteworthy exceptions, was not viewed as divine in the OT or Early Judaism (for a human Messiah, see 1QS 9:11; CD 12:23; 4QPBless 3f; b. Ber. 56b; b. Suk. 52a; 4 Ezra 7:28; b. Sanh. 99a; for the exceptions, see the LXX of Dn 7:13; b. Hag. 14a; b. Sanh. 38b). Peter’s insight that connected these two facts came from God, not his own ingenuity. 
Is Isaiah 22:20–24 a Prophecy About Jesus Christ?

These verses are not talking about the Messiah. They’re talking about Eliakim, son of Hilkiah, a very important person. That is all it’s saying. What we tend to do is assume any person described in an honorific way, as Eliakim is, must be the Messiah. But we want to be careful not to take passages that sound like they are referencing the Messiah and declare them to be about the Messiah, when, in context, they are not.

Now there are certain times when there is an exception. For example, Hosea 3:5 says that in the last days, Israel will come back to the Lord and seek David, their king. David had been dead for a long time, and it says this will happen in the last days. It doesn’t mean that Israel will seek David himself. It means they will seek David’s son, the Messiah. This is one example where a person may be named, like David, yet the passage may be referencing the Messiah when it makes sense in context. This passage, though, is just talking about Eliakim.

 
Isaiah 22:20–24

20 “On that day I will call for my servant, Eliakim son of Hilkiah. 21 I will clothe him with your robe and tie your sash around him. I will put your authority into his hand, and he will be like a father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and to the House of Judah. 22 I will place the key of the House of David on his shoulder; what he opens, no one can close; what he closes, no one can open. 23 I will drive him, like a peg, into a firm place. He will be a throne of honor for his father’s house. 24 They will hang on him the whole burden of his father’s house: the descendants and the offshoots—all the small vessels, from bowls to every kind of jar.  (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
By identifying Eliakim as My servant (v. 20), God authorized his leadership. Eliakim, a godly palace administrator, would benefit from God’s blessing as he governed Judah, yet he too would fall (v. 25). Despite the honor bestowed upon him, Eliakim would not be able to bear the weight of Judah in that day. Eliakim was not to be trusted because he also was human. Instead, Judah must place their trust in God.
Will the Future Third Temple in Ezekiel Require a Natural Spring, and Is Fresh Water Being Found in the Dead Sea a Sign of Biblical Prophecy?

I don’t know about the natural spring in Israel. There could very well be a natural spring someplace by the Dead Sea, because the natural Dead Sea is filled with fresh water. It is filled with fresh water because it comes from the Sea of Galilee, runs down in the Jordan River and makes its way to the lowest part of the earth, into the Dead Sea. This fresh water flowing into the Dead Sea is obviously not enough to turn it fresh.

In Ezekiel 47, in the future messianic kingdom when Jesus is reigning, there’s going to be a river that starts at the Temple Mount and will make its way through the Negev desert and through the wilderness of Judea, all the way to the sea of foul water—that’s how it’s described—and it’s going to make all that barren land beautiful and fertile, and it will produce many trees with fruit on it, and then it will also go into the sea, and it will be so. There will be such a rush of fresh water that it will turn that sea into a living sea with fish. They will actually fish from the Dead Sea. The Dead Sea will live once again. 

Whether they have found a natural spring there or not, it is not enough to make it fresh. What it will take to make the sea of foul water fresh again is the divine remaking of that area in the messianic kingdom. Ezekiel says that there will still be salt pools next to it with the life-giving minerals that we need. When this is all redone in the messianic kingdom, it’s going to be remarkable.

 
Ezekiel 47:7–12

7 When I had returned, I saw a very large number of trees along both sides of the riverbank. 8 He said to me, “This water flows out to the eastern region and goes down to the Arabah. When it enters the sea, the sea of foul water, the water of the sea becomes fresh. 9 Every kind of living creature that swarms will live wherever the river flows, and there will be a huge number of fish because this water goes there. Since the water will become fresh, there will be life everywhere the river goes. 10 Fishermen will stand beside it from En-gedi to En-eglaim. These will become places where nets are spread out to dry. Their fish will consist of many different kinds, like the fish of the Mediterranean Sea. 11 Yet its swamps and marshes will not be healed; they will be left for salt. 12 All kinds of trees providing food will grow along both banks of the river. Their leaves will not wither, and their fruit will not fail. Each month they will bear fresh fruit because the water comes from the sanctuary. Their fruit will be used for food and their leaves for medicine.” (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
47:7–8. On the bank of this river were very many trees on both sides. This river will begin at the temple and flow toward the eastern region, continuing into the Arabah . . . toward the (Dead) sea. The Arabah is the Jordan Valley running south from the Sea of Galilee to the Dead Sea and ultimately to the Gulf of Aqaba at the far northern end of the Red Sea. The Dead Sea is the lowest and saltiest body of water on earth, six times saltier than the oceans, and consequently cannot sustain life, but this will be changed in the millennium. As this river enters the Dead Sea, the salt waters will become fresh, truly a miracle of God. This now-lifeless body of water will then support life. 
47:9–10. Plants and fish will thrive, so everything will live where the river goes. Now the salt and mineral content of the Dead Sea is so intense no fish can survive there, but in the future fishermen will stand on its shores from En Gedi to Eneglaim, oases areas near the Dead Sea (Jos 15:62; 1Sm 23:29; Sg 1:14), spreading their fishing nets. They will catch many kinds of fish, like the fish of the Great Sea (the Mediterranean). 
47:11–12. Although the Dead Sea will become fresh, the swamps and marshes around it will not become fresh; they will be left for salt to supply this essential mineral for the needs of the people and the animals in Israel. There will be all kinds of trees on the riverbanks of this freshwater sea. Their leaves will not wither and their fruit will not fail. They will bear fruit year-round. They will be watered from the sanctuary, so the trees will provide fruit for food, and their leaves will be medicinal, providing healing. It is likely they will have divinely supernatural medicinal qualities so that people will live long in the millennium (cf. Is 65:20).
What Does “Dominion” Mean in Genesis Compared to the Kingdom of God?

God gave humanity dominion, meaning human beings are supposed to rule the earth, or in other words, govern the earth. That’s what dominion means regarding other issues of preaching the kingdom. When Jesus sent His disciples out, they were supposed to be proclaiming that God’s rulership had come to earth with the coming of the King. They were preaching that God needed to rule in their lives, to become the Ruler over their lives. That’s preaching the good news of the kingdom—that God’s rulership is coming to the earth after Jesus’ resurrection. In Matthew 28:19, the Lord Jesus tells His disciples to make disciples of the nations. This is the gospel preaching that Paul talks about in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, where he says, this is the gospel, that Christ died for our sins and rose again. That is the message there.

Today the message that we proclaim today is the Great Commission message of the gospel—the good news by which we are saved—that Jesus died for our sins and rose again. That’s what it is. Humanity’s dominion over the earth is what we’re given as God’s agents on earth, as His image bearers on earth. We’re supposed to rule the earth, govern the earth. It has to do with taking care of the earth. Then His rulership is what the disciples proclaimed. And today, as His disciples, we proclaim the good news that Jesus died for our sins and rose again.

 
Genesis 1:28–31

28 God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth, and subdue it. Rule the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky, and every creature that crawls on the earth.” 29 God also said, “Look, I have given you every seed-bearing plant on the surface of the entire earth and every tree whose fruit contains seed. This food will be for you, 30for all the wildlife of the earth, for every bird of the sky, and for every creature that crawls on the earth—everything having the breath of life in it. I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so. 31 God saw all that He had made, and it was very good. Evening came and then morning: the sixth day. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
1:28–31. The image of God in humanity also includes human beings created to represent God on earth and rule as His regents under Him. Of all created living beings, only humanity has been given dominion over God’s creation, and it extends over all other living beings, whether in the sky, sea, or land animals (v. 28; Sailhamer, The Pentateuch as Narrative, 95). God’s blessing of humankind, like His blessing on the animals in v. 22, is fundamentally concerned with the expansion of life. Further, God then charges both the man and the woman (God said to them) to subdue the land and rule over its animal life. The same command to subdue the land, moreover, was given by God to the Israelites with reference to the land of Canaan. The picture of this day closes with God instructing the couple on what they are to eat (a pattern repeated after God’s “resetting” of the world in chap. 9). They are to eat of the same two groups of vegetation (plant[s] yielding [lit., “sowing”] seed [i.e., “crop” plants] and fruit trees) mentioned in vv. 11–12 that were created on the third day. Verse 30 also refers to a third group of vegetation, the green plant,  mentioned here for the first time not because it was here created, but because it is only now relevant for man. The chapter concludes for the seventh time (and for the first time with the intensifying adverb “very”), And God saw . . . that it was very good.The addition to this utterance of the adverb very is equivalent to what one might otherwise express in English as, “It was the very best that it could possibly be.” The divine work of special creation (i.e., fashioning the raw material of creation into a home specifically good for humanity) was brought to a close—though one crucial point yet remained to be made.
Why is Jesus called “Immanuel” in Isaiah but “Jesus” in the New Testament?

Second Chronicles 32 talks about the fact that the Lord our God is with us. He helps us. He fights our battles. Isaiah 7:14 calls Jesus “Immanuel.” The idea of this child being born, which has a historical precedent in Isaiah 7, clearly relates to a coming birth of the Messiah, and His name means that He will be God with us. 

Immanuel is a compound word in Hebrew, and it means that God is going to be with us. Immanuel is the idea throughout Isaiah of the Messiah being the Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. The concept of God dwelling among us is a theme you can draw out from Old Testament prophecies. When the angel comes to Mary and talks about the fact that the Messiah is going to be born miraculously through her, the name that He is given there specifically is a proper name, Yeshua, or Jesus, which means that Yahweh saves. That’s the whole point. You tie the concept together from 2 Chronicles, that the Lord is with us and He helps us. He comes to be our Savior. 

Christ has many names that are given to Him in Scripture, just like God the Father in the Old Testament is described by so many names. The idea of Isaiah 7 talking about the coming Messiah reminds us that this isn’t just going to be a prophet, an interesting teacher, a rabbi, or someone who’s going to be a moral guide. It is actually God with us. Yet He has a name that is spoken of on the streets of Nazareth, and then later in Jerusalem—Jesus, which means Yahweh saves.  

 
Isaiah 7:14

14 Therefore, the Lord Himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive, have a son, and name him Immanuel. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
Since Ahaz refused to ask for a sign, now the entire house of David, under a threat of destruction because of Ahaz’s lack of faith, would receive a sign: a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel (v. 14). This was the first of two signs. The first sign was addressed to the entire house of David and gave a long-term prophecy of the coming Messiah (vv. 13–15) to reassure them of God’s preservation of the nation. The second sign was a short-term prophecy addressed to Ahaz about the immediate situation he was facing. 

The virgin mother would recognize the special nature of the child and call His name Immanuel, meaning “God is with us” (cf. Mt 1:22). The message to Judah was that God would be with them in a special way through this child. Since the next great vision of the future Davidic king describes Him as “Mighty God” (9:6), Immanuel should also be read as a divine title.

October 2026

How Can I Start a Spiritual Conversation with a Jewish Friend?
What Is the Purpose of Man’s Creation According to Genesis 1:26?
Does Genesis 1 Indicate That God Is Neither Male nor Female?
When the Bible Says ‘Man,’ Does It Include Women?

The word “man” is used generically to mean humanity. Where it’s talking about distinctive features between men and women, the use of the word "man" refers to a male.

We have to read that from the context. For example, Genesis 1:27 says He made them male and female, and then in the second chapter goes into detail about the creation, how it is that God made man as male and female. The point of it is that men and women, in essence, who we are, are fully equal. We may have different functions, and that would be a mistake to deny, but we are both made in the image of God. We are equal in who we are before God. We are justified the same way. That’s what Galatians 3:28 means when it says there’s neither male nor female.  

 
Galatians 3:28–29

28 There is no Jew or Greek, slave or free, male or female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, heirs according to the promise. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
Verse 28 puts all on the same footing (one in Christ); all are equally welcome to come to Christ. Not all are simply equivalent, however. If Jews, Greeks, slaves, free, maleand female no longer existed, Paul could not make such comments as “to the Jew first” (Rm 2:9-10), “slaves, obey your masters” (Eph 6:5), and “wives, submit to your own husbands” (Eph 5:22). Likewise, if in church ministry there is no difference in role between men and women, Paul could not say that elders are men (1Tm 3:1-2) and that women are excluded from teaching leadership (1Tm 2:12). Since becoming Abraham’s family happens according to promise,  it does not happen by law. It is God’s act of grace received by faith. 
What Is the Meaning of Exodus 34:7?

What does it mean that the punishment of God is to the third and fourth generation? Some people think there’s a generational curse. I don’t think so. I think what it’s saying is that when people rebel against God, and there are consequences for God’s divine justice, the consequences for that sin go from generation to generation until it’s broken by the mercy of God. 

I would give the example of someone who becomes an alcoholic. As much as we may consider that a disease, it is a disease with moral factors involved, and it leads to homes in which people and families are destroyed. It’s so dangerous and so harmful.

One of the sad things that we see is that it seems God's justice very often allows the consequences of that behavior. For example, the addiction leads to problems with their kids, who in the next generation often repeat the very same behavior, leading to the same consequences. They then pass that onto their kids and onto their kids until someone turns to the Lord and that behavior is broken. Until then, the consequences continue from generation to generation.  

 
Exodus 34:7

34 keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.” (ESV)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
He shows His lovingkindness to thousands, but He will not leave the guilty unpunished (34:7b). This refers to His distributive justice, that is, His dispensing of both rewards and punishments (cf. Is 3:10; Rm 2:6; 1Pt 1:17; cf. Paul Enns, Moody Handbook of Theology, rev. ed. [Chicago: Moody] 200) as well as His retributive justice, that is, the “expression of Divine wrath in which God punishes the wicked” (Enns, Handbook of Theology , 200; cf. Gn 2:17; Dt 27:26; Gl 3:10; Rm 6:23). These attributes reflect the balance of justice and benevolence; He is a God of justice but He is also very much a God of compassion. Going forward God’s people were not to presume on the latter by being reminded of the former. They should not think lightly of His wrath but should not expect anything less than lovingkindness (cf. 20:5, 6). For Paul’s use of this episode, see the comments on Rm 9:14-16.
Why Did God Choose Israel?

God chose Israel not because they were greater or more righteous than other nations but because of His covenant promises and His sovereign purpose. 

Deuteronomy says that the Lord set His love upon them because He loved them and because He would keep the oath He swore to their fathers. 

Israel was chosen to be a light to the nations and to bring forth the Messiah. Even today, according to Romans 11, the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable. God still has purposes for Israel in His prophetic plan.

 
Deuteronomy 7:7–8

7 The Lord was devoted to you and chose you, not because you were more numerous than all peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples. 8 But because the Lord loved you and kept the oath He swore to your fathers, He brought you out with a strong hand and redeemed you from the place of slavery, from the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt. (HCSB)
 
Romans 11:28–29

28 Regarding the gospel, they are enemies for your advantage, but regarding election, they are loved because of the patriarchs, 29 since God’s gracious gifts and calling are irrevocable. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
Deuteronomy 7:7–8. These verses give the grounds for God’s selection of the nation. The Lord did not set His loveon them because they were vast in number, for they were the fewest of all peoples (v. 7). God’s sovereign covenantal love was set in motion on one man Abraham (Gn 12:1-2), whose family then grew in size to 70 (Dt 10:22) and then ultimately to the size it was at this point in their history. The Lord kept His oath with their forefathers and redeemed Israel by bringing them out with a mighty hand from slavery in Egypt (v. 8). 

Romans 11:28–29. In Paul’s day, many of the Jewish people were enemies of the gospel, but for the sake of the fathers (because of the promises God made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; cf. Gn 12:1-3; 15:6; 17:7-8), they remain God’s chosen people and will someday be restored (v. 28). The gifts and the calling of God (v. 29) does not refer to the supposed permanency of miraculous spiritual gifts. In context, Paul was speaking of God’s covenant promises that remain irrevocable (v. 29). 
What Does Jude 9 Mean When Michael Disputes with the Devil Over Moses’ Body?

In Jude 9, he’s referring to a book that was written between the Old Testament and the New Testament, what we often call the 400 silent years. They really weren’t so silent. There were books written, and they are the apocryphal books and also pseudepigraphal books. What that means is they are false writings, but they are false only in the sense that they say it was written by Enoch or Moses, and they really weren’t written by Enoch or Moses. 

They were written by somebody else to make it sound like they were written by Enoch or by Moses. Jude mentions a few of those, and these were very popular books. It’d be like someone today quoting from the Left Behind book series. 

This comes from the Assumption of Moses, where a story is told of a dispute about what to do with the body of Moses. In that story, Michael the archangel, when he was disputing with the devil about Moses’ body, did not dare bring an abusive condemnation against them but rebuked them in the Lord’s name. Jude is saying, if even the archangel Michael didn’t dispute with the devil in his own name, but used the Lord’s name, how should we deal with a satanic attack? We must use the name of God and not our own power. That’s the point Jude is making now. 

Did that really happen? Well, it could very well be that the Assumption of Moses had true things in it, and that’s what Jude is citing. I’m not saying that it didn’t happen. I’m just saying it didn’t happen in Scripture. It is possible that there are true things that are recorded in books that are outside of Scripture.

 
Jude 9–10

9 Yet Michael the archangel, when he was disputing with the Devil in a debate about Moses’ body, did not dare bring an abusive condemnation against him but said, “The Lord rebuke you!” 10 But these people blaspheme anything they don’t understand. What they know by instinct like unreasoning animals—they destroy themselves with these things. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
As did false teachers in the past, the present false teachers reject authority, speaking against things which they do not understand (10). Not even angelic beings act this way (8, see the comments on 2Pt 2:10-11), as in Michael’s contest with the devil over Moses’ body (9). While this idea may come from The Assumption of Moses, that Jude cited it means the story is true. Jude’s point was that Michael’s rebuke was God-directed, not personal (10).
Why Did Jesus Say, ‘Pray That Your Escape Would Not Happen in Winter or on the Sabbath’ in Matthew 24:20?

He’s really talking to the people who will be alive in the future Tribulation period. They are living in Israel, in particular. I think these events describe what takes place in Jerusalem. 

It’s saying that in the middle of the Tribulation, when the Antichrist takes his seat on the throne in the Temple and tries to demand worship, those who live in Judea, particularly Jerusalem, need to flee. He says, “Woe to pregnant women and nursing mothers in those days.” Why? Because those Jewish women who are pregnant and nursing will find it much harder to flee.

Jesus also said to pray that your escape may not be in winter or on the Sabbath. Why? Because in Israel, winter is the rainy season and there are flash floods. It is very difficult. Roads are closed. There are a lot of problems escaping during winter because of the frequent rain.

As for the Sabbath in the land of Israel, even today, everything’s closed. There’s no public transportation. There’s no way to get around except by car. And even then, some roads are closed on the Sabbath. It makes it very clear that when the abomination of desolation occurs, escaping will be much more difficult for pregnant women and nursing mothers, or for anyone fleeing during winter or on the Sabbath.

 
Matthew 24:17–22

17 A man on the housetop must not come down to get things out of his house. 18 And a man in the field must not go back to get his clothes. 19 Woe to pregnant women and nursing mothers in those days! 20 Pray that your escape may not be in winter or on a Sabbath. 21 For at that time there will be great tribulation, the kind that hasn’t taken place from the beginning of the world until now and never will again! 22 Unless those days were limited, no one would survive. But those days will be limited because of the elect. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
Verses 17–18 indicate that people should flee without giving any thought to getting things from their homes. During the winter (v. 20), roads were wet, muddy, and could be extremely hard to travel on. On the Sabbath, they might be more reluctant to flee as it would violate the command to rest, or they might not find much help along the way. 24:21–22. This is probably a reference to the future tribulation period, and not to AD 70. As bad as the Jewish war with Rome was, it does not match the severity of the language Jesus employed here. The phrase unless those days had been cut short means that God would not allow the days to go on for an undetermined time. This shows He is sovereign over the length of the great tribulation. Elect (v. 22; cf. also 24:24, 31) is often applied to Christians (cf. Rm 8:33; Col 3:12), and it is usually assumed that the word here refers to believers.
What Bible Verses Say Same-Sex Marriage Is Wrong?

People object to the Old Testament since we’re not under the Law of Moses. But even though we’re not under that law, it still teaches us what constitutes sexual morality. 

In the New Testament, we have laws or commandments that say we should practice morality and reject immorality, and we get the definition of what constitutes sexual immorality through the Old Testament. That would include homosexuality. 

There’s the passage in Romans 1 that says, “This is why God delivered them over to degrading passions. For even their females exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. The males, in the same way, also left natural relations with females and were inflamed in their lust for one another. Males committed shameless acts with males and received in their own persons the appropriate penalty of their error” (HCSB).  

So, in Romans 1:26
–27, it clearly seems to say even in the new covenant that same-sex relationships are something that God rejects. He doesn’t reject the people. He loves them and wants them to come to Him. But instead, He rejects that kind of relationship.

 
Romans 1:25–27

25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served something created instead of the Creator, who is praised forever. Amen.

26 This is why God delivered them over to degrading passions. For even their females exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 The males in the same way also left natural relations with females and were inflamed in their lust for one another. Males committed shameless acts with males and received in their own persons the appropriate penalty of their error. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
People “exchanged the truth of God” for idols (1:25); For this reason God gave them over, this time, to homosexual behavior. Some claim that Paul is saying that it is wrong only for those whom God did not create as homosexuals to engage in homosexual behavior (the underlying thought being that God has created some as homosexuals, a contention that is unsubstantiated in science or in Scripture). Others argue that God is forbidding the ritual homosexuality practiced in Greco-Roman religions. The text says neither. The statement indicates that the homosexual behavior is a form of judgment against those who reject the knowledge of Him. If it is a form of His judgment, then the people of God must neither practice nor condone it. 
Should Christians Expect Suffering or Seek It Out?

Paul writes that everyone who desires to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will undergo persecution. We’re going to suffer persecution if we want to live godly lives. We also live in bodies in which the outer man is decaying, Paul writes, yet our inner man is being renewed day by day (2 Cor. 4:16). Part of that outer man decaying has to do with illness and weakness and things like that, so we’re going to suffer physically.  

Jesus said, “In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world” (John 16:33). There will be tribulation. It says in James 1, “Consider it all joy . . . whenever . . .”. In other words, trials are not only possible, they’re inevitable. We’re all going to experience them. 

All of these verses tell me that suffering is something we will all experience in this life. You don’t have to pursue it. You just have to pursue walking with God faithfully and even in the midst of suffering, and trust Him through it. 

And you know what? God gives us the grace, the enablement to do whatever it is that He gives us. Paul said three times he prayed to have that thorn in the flesh, whatever that was, taken from him. But God’s answer to him was grace. The word grace there means not undeserved favor, but “my [enablement] is sufficient for you.” God gives us what we need to endure suffering faithfully with Him. 

 
James 1:2–3

2 Consider it a great joy, my brothers, whenever you experience various trials, 3 knowing that the testing of your faith produces endurance. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
The readers are to consider their trials with all (not some) joy. Trials are unpredictable (encounter means “fall into”) and not all the same (various). The testing of . . . faith is designed to reveal the quality of one’s faith and to produce stamina. Testing could also be translated “the approved part” of one’s faith. It is not just the tested faith that produces endurance; it is the approved or genuine part of one’s faith that produces maturity. 
Does the Bible Really Mention Unicorns?

There are places in the King James Version that use the word “unicorn.” These are found in Numbers 23:22 and 24:8. 

The Hebrew word means a horned animal. It refers to a wild ox that was later domesticated and became the oxen we know today. So it is referring to the wild oxen. 

That’s what the word meant when it was translated into Latin in the Vulgate. The Vulgate translated it as a one-horned beast. The King James translators then used the word “unicorn,” which in 17th-century English didn't necessarily refer to the mythical creature we think of today. 

That’s how the “unicorn” came to be in the King James Version. If you were to read a modern version, it says, “God brought [Israel] out of Egypt; he is like the horns of a wild ox for them (Numbers 23:22, HCSB). 

 
Numbers 23:19–24

19 God is not a man who lies,
or a son of man who changes His mind.
Does He speak and not act,
or promise and not fulfill?
20 I have indeed received a command to bless;
since He has blessed, I cannot change it.
21 He considers no disaster for Jacob;
He sees no trouble for Israel.
The LORD their God is with them,
and there is rejoicing over the King among them.
22 God brought them out of Egypt;
He is like the horns of a wild ox for them.
23 There is no magic curse against Jacob
and no divination against Israel.
It will now be said about Jacob and Israel,
“What great things God has done!”
24 A people rise up like a lioness;
They rouse themselves like a lion.
They will not lie down until they devour the prey
and drink the blood of the slain. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
The Exodus is recalled with the words God brings them out of Egypt, demonstrating God’s commitment to His people (v. 22). They had also experienced great fortune and the Lord’s personal presence. The phrase the shout of a king is among them (v. 21) demonstrates the “Divine Warrior” motif, an image of God’s military power spoken on behalf of Israel (Ps 47:5). A God with such might, who will protect Israel as with the horns of a wild ox, is able to thwart any omen or divination placed on Israel. God’s people will be like a lion, devouring any who would seek to threaten her.
Does the Name ‘Golgotha,’ the Place of the Skull, Have Any Significance?

The Hebrew word “Golgotha” means skull. It’s related to the Hebrew word gulgolet. It does seem like that there are a couple of things going on there. One is that it was a place where executions took place. Therefore, it was a place associated with death. 

Secondly, I think there may be a connection to Genesis 3:15, where the Messiah would crush the serpent’s head. Here at the place of the skull, Jesus defeats Satan through His death and resurrection. There may be symbolic significance there. Now, we don’t know exactly where Golgotha was. There are different views. Some people think it was at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Others think it was at Gordon’s Calvary. Either way, the emphasis in Scripture seems to be more theological than geographical. It was the place where death was defeated. 

 
Genesis 3:15

15 I will put hostility between you and the woman,
and between your seed and her seed.
He will strike your head,
and you will strike his heel. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
In v. 15 God addressed the power behind the serpent, Satan, further underscoring the difference between His treatment of Satan and that of the couple by indicating that Satan’s final defeat will be brought about by one of the couple’s own descendants—yet one who is at the same time more than a mere descendant. This pronouncement in fact represents the first direct specific prediction concerning the work of the Messiah, which has appropriately been regarded from the earliest period of Christian interpretation as the Protevangelium (lit., “the first gospel”). Even before the New Testament was written, the messianic import of this verse was recognized by Jewish interpreters (as evident in the translation of the LXX), and it continued to be affirmed within the Jewish community for several centuries after the birth of Christianity (in the early Aramaic paraphrastic translations, known as the targumim Pseudo-Jonathan, Neofiti, and Onqelos as well as the rabbinic commentary Genesis Rabbah23:5). This shows how entrenched this view was, and clearly this is the most “natural” and logical understanding of the passage. This passage bears out not only a reference to the final victory of Messiah but also to His death in that He will be bruised on the heel.  His divine nature may be implied by the use of He, the “seed” of the woman, who is portrayed as issuing the final “death blow” to Satan (He shall bruise you on the head), which is something that only God can and will do. God the Son will do this, as stated in Ps 110:6b (lit., “He will crush [the] head”); Rm 16:20; 1Jn 3:8; Rv 20:10 (where Satan is thrown into the lake of fire under the authority of—if not directly by—the enthroned Christ). 
What Happens to People Who Never Hear the Gospel?

Scripture teaches that everyone has some revelation of God through creation and conscience. Romans 1 says that what can be known about God is evident because God has shown it to them through what has been made. People are accountable for the light they have received through this general revelation. The problem is not that people are seeking God and can’t find Him. The problem is that people suppress the truth God has revealed because they don’t want to acknowledge Him or follow His ways.

At the same time, God is absolutely just. In Genesis 18:25, Abraham said, “Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” The answer is yes, He will. We also know that salvation is through Jesus alone. “There is no other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). Our responsibility is to proclaim the gospel to all nations and trust God with those things that are beyond our understanding.

 
Romans 1:19–20

19 since what can be known about God is evident among them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen since the creation of the world, being understood through what He has made. As a result, people are without excuse. (HCSB)

From the Moody Bible Commentary:
 
Because launches the substantiation for Paul’s claim that people suppress knowledge of God. This knowledge is evident within them. For (1:20) introduces the basis for that claim. Paul mentions a paradox when he says that God’s invisible attributes are clearly seen. Creation displays God’s power and deity, so that when people suppress knowledge about Him available through the created order they are without excuse when He judges them for it. No one ever responds correctly to the light of God in creation.

September 2026

Is Climate Change Connected to Luke 21 and End Times Prophecy?
Why Is David Called “The Man After God’s Own Heart” Despite All His Failures?
Why Did David and Bathsheba Name Their Son Solomon When God Told Nathan to Name Him Jedidiah?
What Does Romans 8:3 Mean When It Says God Condemned Sin In the Flesh?
Profile

Dr. Michael Rydelnik

Dr. Michael Rydelnik is Professor Emeritus of Jewish Studies and Bible at Moody Bible Institute, as well as the Host/Bible teacher on Moody Radio’s Open Line® with Dr. Michael Rydelnik. The son of Holocaust survivors, Michael was raised in an observant Jewish home in Brooklyn, New York. He became a follower of Jesus the Messiah as a high school student and began teaching the Bible almost immediately. He is the author of several books and is the co-editor of and contributor to The Moody Bible Commentary. Michael and his wife, Eva, live in West Michigan and have two adult sons.

Profile

Tricia McMillan

Tricia McMillan is the senior producer of Chris Fabry Live, Equipped with Chris Brooks, and Moody Radio’s Open Line® with Dr. Michael Rydelnik. She has worked at Moody Radio since 2000 on a variety of programs. She is a graduate of Moody Bible Institute and has a Master of Ministry from Moody Theological Seminary. Tricia is married to Nate, has three children and lives in the Chicago suburbs.

Open Line with Dr. Michael Rydelnik

Open Line with Dr. Michael Rydelnik

At times, all believers have questions about the Bible, God or the spiritual life. Where can we turn when we need guidance from the God's Word? Moody Radio encourages you to bring your Bible and spiritual life questions to Moody Radio’s Open Line® with Dr. Michael Rydelnik every week.

© 2026 Moody Global Media, Moody Bible Institute